db4o Developer Community

db4o open source object database, native to Java and .NET
Welcome to db4o Developer Community Sign in | Join
in Search
More Search Options

Browse by Tags

All Tags » Native Queries » Query   (RSS)
  • Re: Whitepaper on Next-Generation Object Database Standardization

    Hi everybody.  I'm sorry that I was not able to attend the meeting on Dec 12. I hope that someone can post some information on it. I think it is great that these topics are being discussed, but I also have some significant disagrements with points being made here. My biggest issue is that I don't agree with the premise of the OMG RFI ...
    Posted to ODBMS.ORG (Forum) by w7cook on December 17, 2007
  • Query Optimization

    I work for a company that is evaluating DB4o, but we have come across some performance issues.  I understand that the .NET version of DB4o includes all the optimization functionality.  I am using .NET 3.0 and DB4o 6.105, and the queries that I am executing aren't being optimized, even when ...
    Posted to db4o User Forum (Forum) by dkym on July 18, 2007
  • Best Practices

    As my my first db4o project, I am trying to organize all my digital photographs. I have Media class, with Photo class derived from it.  In the Photo class I have a datetime field and a  .NET List of Person class. One of my  eventual desires is to know a count of the people in photos as a total and for some time period.  Is ...
    Posted to db4o User Forum (Forum) by MGillson on April 7, 2007
  • Ordinals only for enum NL Query?

    I am using a NL query in Java to do a search with an enum field as a criterion. The field is indexed. It seems that it only works if I compare the ordinal values of the enum. When I say it ''works'' I mean that I get the correct number of objects back. Without the ordinal methods the enum field seems to be treated as unconstrained. Is this ...
    Posted to db4o User Forum (Forum) by pspringer on March 1, 2007
  • Dynamic queries crash if Comparator used

    Hi, I am evaluating db4o for use at work. We store a single table of fairly simple data (no joins, just one class with 13 or so string/long fields), but it needs to be able to handle millions of records. Currently we are using a normal SQL database, but some of the queries are a bit slow: 10-20 seconds is too much. I am having trouble getting ...
    Posted to db4o User Forum (Forum) by tysonlt on December 11, 2006